mr. t.......... on mission

encouraging one another to be on God's mission

Saturday, September 23, 2006

encouraging and leaving

“But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them” (II Timothy 3:14).

“For this reason I left you in Crete, that you should set in order the things that are lacking, and appoint elders in every city as I commanded you” (Titus 1:5).

Paul never abandoned his new disciples, churches and leaders. He always followed up with encouragement and further instruction, even as he left to preach the gospel in other places. He would do this primarily through faithful men like Timothy. He also sent letters to the churches along with his faithful disciples, to remind them of “his ways in Christ” (I Corinthians 4:17). Paul himself sometimes revisited the churches to strengthen and encourage them (see Acts 14:21-23).

Paul modeled a Biblical pattern for the new churches to follow. The new churches would model this same pattern for others while Paul observed their obedience. Most of the time, he heard reports of their faithfulness (or lack thereof) from a distance. Paul would revisit the churches to delegate authority to the recognized leaders who demonstrated obedience (Acts 14:23), or he would have faithful men like Titus do so (Titus 1:5). Finally, Paul would encourage them to continue following the pattern they had learned and practiced, even as he left for another place.

Jesus modeled the same pattern for His disciples. A careful reading of John chapters 13 through 17 reveals the same pattern for training: Jesus modeled, observed, delegated, encouraged and left. But He did not abandon His disciples; He left them “the Helper”, and continued to be ever present with them through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit (see John 14:15-18). Jesus also prayed for the future spiritual generations of new believers that would believe because of His obedient disciples. In John 17 Jesus revealed how He was to accomplish the Father’s master plan, through reproducing generations of loving obedient disciples.

Jesus said: “I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who will believe in Me through their word; that they all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that you sent Me” (John 17:20,21).

Like the previous stage of delegating authority, we often fail to encourage and leave our disciples. It is difficult to let go and change our role; after all, we have invested so much of our time, effort and resources in them! Don’t we have the right to continue to be their instructor? And, what if they mess up?

Remember, we are not talking about abandoning our disciples. We are talking about moving on to another stage of development, a different level of trust and maturity. We can continue to have a mentoring relationship, but that relationship should mature into a higher level as we delegate responsibility and authority to them.

It is very similar to how we should train our children. At first, they are very dependent upon us. We are their role models, they observe everything we do and say. Then we observe how they do, how they follow our example. There is a great deal of correction and discipline in the early stages. As a child enters adolescence, they become more independent. They still need our guidance but they begin to handle more responsibilities on their own. As they mature, we delegate more freedom to act on their own accord, but we still hold them accountable for their actions. We continue to encourage them to live according to the pattern that we set before them. Sooner than we like, they grow up, become very independent and leave us (here the analogy breaks down, as church planters we should do the leaving). They become an adult and start their own family. They will make mistakes; nevertheless, the cycle of life reproduces itself and will repeat the whole process again through another generation. Our relationship still exists, but it is changed radically by this natural order of things. This is the natural progression of a healthy child who develops into a mature adult and starts his/her own family.

We should practice the same cycle of training in our spiritual life. But it should not take years and years to reproduce. Depending on how the mentor and trainee carry out their roles, the time it takes for the reproduction of a new spiritual generation should be relatively short. Christ took only 3 years. Paul never stayed more than 3 years in one place, but most of the time; it was only a matter of months before the second generation of disciples was delegating authority to a new third generation. When Paul saw that his churches were reproducing healthy churches, he let go and moved on. He continued to encourage them, sometimes he revisited them, sent letters, or left a disciple like Timothy who was fully authorized to do everything necessary to help the church obey the Great Commission. But Paul never stayed; he left them to continue the work on their own. Did they make mistakes? They sure did, but Paul still gave them full authority to carry on the work. He even left the job of choosing leaders for the third generation churches to second-generation disciples like Titus.

“For this reason I left you in Crete, that you should set in order the things that are lacking, and appoint elders in every city as I commanded you” (Titus 1:5).

What are your thoughts? Do you have any experience with leaving to make other disciples? How did you continue to encourage from a distance?

6 Comments:

Blogger Darrell said...

As usual great stuff brother!

Along the same lines I just spent a week training with David Watson and others. One of the most helpful things I learned was, “All first generation churches are heretical”. David said in his experience it takes about 2 years for a church to get it all right. He echoed what you have written about leaving.

Do you have a “check list” of things you want a church planter to model for a new church before he moves on? There are obvious things like Baptism, and the Lord’s Supper. What about other things the church should be, and be doing? Similarly what about training and mentoring leaders? Do you have a “point” you want every leader to get to before you change the nature of your relationship with them?

In my small and insignificant experience I have seen the power of intentionally assigning leadership responsibility to new believers. It has proven to be one of the most effective means of causing them to grow. I make a new person every week responsible for leading the discussion teaching time. I will meet with them during the week to help them prepare. Every time a new person does this they are more confident, more caring, and more eager to learn more, from that point on. It is my opinion that Satan has pulled a fast one on us with this whole “clergy” deal. Having “The Pastor” do all the talking greatly weakens the church, and stunts its growth.

Sunday, September 24, 2006 10:47:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I echo Darrell with his, "as usual great stuff brother!"

Since you quote Titus 1:5 I will go ahead and ask you if it is your custom as an apostle/missionary/church planter to APPOINT elders of the new churches started? We personally have not followed this instruction and have left the churches to appoint their own elders/leaders. What I have done is on occasion to encourage a more developed house church to appoint elders, but I have never been the one to name anyone. I'd be interested in your thoughts.

Sunday, September 24, 2006 12:51:00 PM  
Blogger Tim Patterson said...

Darrell,

I saw your blog and went to Watson's site. There is some good resources there.

There is a check list of things that we want them to model and remodel. There is a pattern that we want them follow every time they meet with their leaders. I will do a post on this, since it could get too lengthy for the comment section. I will try to do it by next weekend.

You are using a best practice by assigning responsibility early to new believers. I totally agree.

Sunday, September 24, 2006 7:05:00 PM  
Blogger Tim Patterson said...

Guy,

After the first few disciples are empowered, there is no need for me to delegate authority. I don't baptize, do Lord's Supper or laying on of hands unless absolutely necessary. I try to push the authoritative modeling to the first generation of indigenous believers from the beginning. Obviously if there is no indigenous believer ready to do that, we have to.

Our leaders are appointed as they are identified by church planters, trained on the job and mentored. The new churches will object if the church planter picks someone not suitable to them. Then much later, after the churches have matured and reproduced, they are turned loose to appoint their own leaders. Most of the time it is very obvious who the leaders are and it is quite natural for them to fill that role.

Each church planter has leader groups that meet separately from the house church meetings for training. Most become elders, some become church planters. The house churches send a team of helpers with their church planter leader to reproduce in another place.

Sunday, September 24, 2006 7:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for the response to my question. What you write is pretty close to our own practice here as well.

Tuesday, September 26, 2006 8:15:00 AM  
Blogger Paul Burleson said...

Mr. T,

I've been out of town and on the road the past couple of weeks but know that you've been remembered in prayer during that time. My best and God's blessings on you and yours.

Paul B.

Friday, September 29, 2006 12:33:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home